A couple of years ago I worked as a research intern for the BC Premier's Technology Council, an organization created by Premier Gordon Campbell to advise him on technology-related issues facing British Columbia and its citizens. The task I'd been given at the time: research the technology sectors in British Columbia and predict which ten technologies British Columbia could dominate in ten years' time. This was a fantastic opportunity for me, not only because I would get to meet and interview BC's many CEO and CTOs, but also because it would give me an opportunity to amortize the cost of some very expensive words I had learned in the UBC MBA program.
Like the word 'amortize', for example.
Not two days into the research, I realized that I had been duped. No one, especially governments, has been particularly effective in making technology predictions, and it was doubtful that an MBA student with a predisposition to using the word 'synergy' an alarmingly large percentage of the time was likely to change that. I realized that the real problem that we needed to solve wasn't picking the right technologies, but fostering the right attitude. The fundamental change that was, and still is, required is a cultural shift to embrace entrepreneurship.
Peter Drucker once said "The best way to predict the future is to create it." For us to be successful, we need to change our thinking about our shortcomings. If you look at the ten Premier's Technology Council reports, the research has identified two major problem areas for BC's technology sector: not enough money, and not enough talent. To which I say:
Of course, there are some caveats to my enthusiasm. My background is software, an industry where you can actually get something done for the kinds of dollars available from these programs. If you're working with web-based technologies, the cost of developing a startup from zero to launch has declined dramatically, and you could launch something decent for less than $50K. I must concede that these dollars won't build you a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical. And of course, you can't run most companies on students and outsourced labour.
But that's not really my point.
My point is that our success will be determined by our ability to focus on the positive: attitude is the paintbrush of life – it colors every situation. Instead of waiting for someone to fund your great idea and pay you a salary, why not focus on what you could do with the options you have available? What could you do with a bit of money? What's the next goal that $10K or $20K could help you achieve? Who could you tap locally or globally to take the next step and prove the idea has legs? Even better, could it help you prove that your idea doesn't have legs? There's nothing wrong with failing early, especially if it frees your time to pursue something more likely to succeed.
We have the opportunities - so by now I hope you're asking yourself: what's stopping me?
There is also the small business tax credit and there used to be provisions for NSERC grants for R&D that could partially fund salaries students and researchers. It would be an interesting exercise to do an apples-to-apples comparison of two startups, one in Cali and one in BC, and compare their costs. I am always suspicious that there are hidden costs in both locales (base salaries, health care premiums, insurance, legal fees, rents, utilities, etc.) that are often unmentioned but likely differ.
"It's a global market - go hire someone smarter than you"
i am totally agree with you for this point.It's always better to hire the employee with specific and desired requisite for a par6icular task.As i have also hired people from marketraise company (www.marketraise.com) .And i am totally satisfied with there services.Hiring people from right place is most important factor in virtual servicing.Thanks marketraise for your great services.
Sophia
Location matters. Even though it's technically *possible* to start a company anywhere, there are some places in the world where there's a much greater chance of success than others. I mean places like Toronto, Mumbai, New York, Stanford. My experience in BC for launching technology companies has been one of seeing them surviving _despite_ it, not because of it. Some places are different, and provide a more positive environment, and entrepreneurs owe it to themselves to go to those places.