This morning I attended an Edmonton City Council meeting along with Eric. I had never been to a council meeting before, so the whole process was rather interesting and at times even entertaining. That said, I wonder how they get anything done! Item E1 was titled "City-Wide Wireless Internet and Wi-Fi Service - Pilot Project Internal Evaluation" and was marked on the agenda as "time specific, first item at 9:30 AM". They finally got around to it at 10:30 AM.
Two members of Next Gen Edmonton joined a representative from the city's IT branch to provide council with an overview of the report on Wireless Edmonton that was published on May 15, 2008. I haven't actually seen the report, but it outlines the following information:
The current service is built atop the City of Edmonton's existing Internet infrastructure, which is how they can keep costs fairly low (Eric and I still think it's too expensive though). That means that future eZones could quite easily be setup at any City-owned location that has Internet/wireless already for administration purposes. Other potential expansion sites include transit corridors (LRT and/or high priority bus routes) and mobile units that would travel to smaller festivals and events.
The council passed the following recommendation/motion:
There wasn't too much discussion, but a few interesting questions were raised:
I think Councillor Henderson's question is extremely pertinent. What's the point of offering the service if you're just going to cripple it? I'm definitely in favor of getting rid of the filtering.
Councillor Leibovici's question is responsible, but largely misses the point in my opinion. The city isn't operating the wireless service to turn a profit, but rather to facilitate indirect returns. The productivity gains and everything else that comes along with having free wireless is what really matters.
The IT representative (didn't catch his name...might have been Stephen Gordon, who is Manager of Operations) made a really great point. He said that offering the wireless service is important for Edmonton's credibility. There's an expectation that world class facilities have Wi-Fi available, and Edmonton needs to live up to that expectation if it wants to compete on the world stage.
The presentation today made it clear that the City of Edmonton doesn't want to compete with commercial providers of wireless Internet access. Instead the city can serve a particular niche, offering service in public locations that commercial providers would probably ignore (such as the library). I think that makes sense.
I think more needs to be done to improve the state of wireless in Edmonton, but it doesn't have to fall on the city. There's definitely opportunity for the private sector to get involved. I'm glad the city is doing something though, and I look forward to the expansion of their eZones.
I read this post on my laptop in an airport in the US on a free wireless service.
My thoughts are that this type of connectivity shouldn't come at a cost, especially if it is a degraded service. While I can't see how you can directly correlate some type of ROI for this to the City, I can certainly see the productivity benefits for our community. If Edmonton wants to frame itself as a good place to do business, go to school, keep connected to family and friends - it needs to be more progressive in providing these types of services.
Keep up the good work.
I was at the meeting as well. I think the city has a long way to go before they pull a cost effective, well oiled wifi network out.
I'm actually working on my own initiative to provide wifi to the Whyte Avenue district of Edmonton. You can read more about it at http://wirelessedmonton.ca.
[...] Like the Next Gen wireless service, the EPL’s wireless runs atop existing infrastructure. Wireless network traffic runs over an IPSec/GRE tunnel and eventually makes its way onto the Alberta SuperNet. The service is currently limited to 250 users per branch, and each user is restricted to 500 KB/s of throughput. Web content itself is not filtered, but only the HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols are allowed. The EPL chose Aruba Networks to provide the equipment for the service. They are capable of supporting 256 access points in total, or 128 redundant access points. The EPL is currently using 52 and expect to add an additional 30 over the next few weeks. They constantly monitor the network and will make adjustments wherever necessary to ensure reliable access. [...]
20K to set wifi in each area is insane!!! I'm sure a couple of societies scum lined their pockets with more than half.