Google Reacts to Twitter's Response in Civil Manner, but We Know That Blood is Boiling

Posted by Knowlton Thomas

Yesterday, Google announced salient changes to its search engine. Most notably, it placed an emphasis on Google+.

We’re […] introducing three new features:

1. Personal Results, which enable you to find information just for you, such as Google+ photos and posts—both your own and those shared specifically with you, that only you will be able to see on your results page; 

2. Profiles in Search, both in autocomplete and results, which enable you to immediately find people you’re close to or might be interested in following; and, 

3. People and Pages, which help you find people profiles and Google+ pages related to a specific topic or area of interest, and enable you to follow them with just a few clicks. Because behind most every query is a community. 

This immediately caught the eye of venture capitalist and tech journalist MG Siegler, who called the move "a slippery slope for Google" and believes the U.S. Justice Department will launch another antitrust inquiry on the company as a result.

How on Earth is Google going to avoid antitrust inquiries? Google is using Search to propel their social network. […] I think anyone should be able to see how this is a very slippery slope for Google. And it’s surprising they would try this given the heat on them in other directions with regard to antitrust.

Shortly after, Twitter became the first company to respond to Google's changes, calling it a "bad day for the internet."

We’re concerned that as a result of Google’s changes, finding [certain] information will be much harder for everyone. We think that’s bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users.

Now, today, Google has responded to Twitter's response. The company naturally defends Search plus Your World, saying they're "surprised" by the microblogging platform's reaction.

We are a bit surprised by Twitter's comments about Search plus Your World, because they chose not to renew their agreement with us last summer.

Who's right, who's wrong, and who's going to make the next move? These companies are remaining civil—and others like Facebook, Microsoft, and the government have yet to enter the fray—but this is a big issue just beginning to bubble. A bloody battle could be instigated in an instant.

Image: CheezeBurger

Company:
Google
Website:
http://www.google.com
Location:
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful. As a first step to fulfilling that mission, Google's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed a new approach to online search that took root in a Stanford University dorm room and quickly spread to information seekers around the globe. Google is now widely recognized as the world's largest search engine --... more

Company:
Twitter
Website:
http://www.twitter.com
Location:
San Francisco, California, United States

Twitter is a privately funded startup with offices in the SoMA neighborhood of San Francisco, CA. Started as a side project in March of 2006, Twitter has grown into a real-time short messaging service that works over multiple networks and devices. In countries all around the world, people follow the sources most relevant to them and access information via Twitter as it happens—from breaking world news to updates... more


Related Articles


blog comments powered by Disqus

Knowlton Thomas

Knowlton Thomas

Knowlton is the managing editor of Techvibes. Based in Vancouver, Knowlton has been published in national publications and has also appeared on television and radio. Previously he was an editor for New Westminster weekly The Other Press and served on its board of directors. When not working, Knowlton enjoys playing tennis or otherwise enjoying the outdoors. more



Who's Hiring



Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus